Sunday, April 13, 2008

I love salmon

The Alaskan wild salmon fishery has been threatened by overfishing, fish farming, and climate change

I mean it. Salmon is my favorite fish- but wild salmon only. Now, it along with several other fish I enjoy are off my table. Mercury, toxins, fish farms have limited my consumption, but now there just aren't any fish. Wild chinook salmon have collapsed. Last week California and Oregon announced what some had been speculating for the last month - the chinook salmon had collapsed, and the coho population was about to collapse. Less than 6% of the normal run is expected this year. All commercial fisheries are closed (putting many fishermen out of work) and the sport fishery is going to be small, and extremely regulated. How did we get here? We have known about declining salmon runs for years.

And why wasn't this tragedy screamed across the headlines of North America? In a time when sustainability is heard on every street corner, why didn't every newspaper pick up this story? Instead, I heard about it in a class, and then an astute student, Robert Walker, brought an article to my attention. Thank you Robert.

The collapse is being blamed on ocean temperatures and the use of water in California (irrigation) along with the usual culprits: destroyed habitats and pollution.
Many biologists believe a combination of human-caused and natural factors will ultimately explain the collapse, including both marine conditions and freshwater factors such as in-stream water withdrawals, habitat alterations, dam operations, construction, pollution, and changes in hatchery operations.

Fish varieties live best in a narrow range of temperatures. Though overfishing had a great deal to do with the collapse of the cod in the Grand Banks 15 years ago, the no-show return of the cod has been blamed on the change in ocean temperatures. Cod have a very narrow range, and the Grand Banks have changed, and scientists are learning more about why the cod are not repopulating the banks. global warming, ocean temperatures, and wild annual fluctuations of fish - all of this encompassed within theories of the non-linear progressions of weather and its relation to global warming, have caused havoc in the seas. Now salmon could also be another victim of global warming.

And California's need and lack of water. With 38 million people (1/8 of all Americans) and the largest agricultural economy in the nation, the need for water has always been a stumbling block for the state. Despite years of stealing water, diversions, and conservation, the state has found itself in a drought again (the state has a history of droughts), and water and fish have been victims. The state and federal regulators are diverting so much water to irrigate the farms, the fish have been dying.
The Bush administration says that the reason for the sudden collapse of the Sacramento fall Chinook stock is "not readily apparent," but fishing, tribal and environmental groups point to massive water exports from the California Delta in recent years and rapidly declining water quality in Central Valley rivers as the key factors behind the fishery collapse. Although the ocean conditions were undoubtedly poor, many of the fish never made it to the ocean because they were sucked into the massive state and federal export pumps in the Delta or starved as they migrated through the estuary, due to the collapse of the Delta food chain.

Where are we heading as a civilization? Should everyone read Collapse and get the message? How many more signs do we need?
  • cod collapse
  • deforestation
  • desertification
  • Arctic pollution
  • Arctic warming
  • rising prices
  • resources exhaustion
  • oil peak
  • global warming
  • extreme weather events
  • weakened immune systems
  • human population explosion
  • honey bee collapse
  • salmon collapse
According the Diamond's Collapse the reasons for collapse are
  1. Environmental damage caused by humans
  2. Climate change
  3. The presence of hostile neighbors
  4. The absence of trading partners
  5. The nature of a society's response to points 1-4
What do you think? Is living sustainably an answer? Can sustainability reach far enough, deep enough in to the minds of people to make the changes that are necessary in the time that we have?

13 comments:

Kyle Kurtzal said...

I don't get why we can't feed our farm salmon PCB free food. But just assuming that there's no way around consuming 10x the normal amount of contaminants in a farm-salmon as opposed to a wild-salmon, maybe we could start making salmon age appropiate.

Farmed Salmon has more fat which means it has more PCB's and more Omega 3 fatty acids. If you're 50+ years old I say eat as much farm Salmon as you want. You need the Omega 3's for your heart and by the time the PCB's kill you, you'd be dead allready. The real victims of farm salmon will be those young enough to accumulate lots of PCB's over a life time, so they get the wild salmon.

I don't think there's any way around fish farming. We need it. There's still room on this planet for another 4 billion people and the food's got to come from somewhere. Maybe if we can make giant fish farming zones and make the case that it's in our economic interest to save the oceans to keep them profitable, we just might be able to eat seafood for another couple thousand years insead of another hundred or so. I myself am not ready to start eating any soylent green.

Caitlin Newman said...

I think this shows just how much global warming has affected every aspect of our lives. When people think of global warming, I'll bet most don't think about how it is affecting the salmon (and other fish) population. I know I didn't. What many of us don't realize is that global warming IS affecting our whole lives and everyone needs to start paying attention to it in order to make the changes we need to.

I agree with you, Kyle, when you say there probably is not a way around fish farming. Until everyone realizes that we CAN do something about (and actually care enough to do it), we will need these farms because Earth's population continues to rise and we all need to eat.

Unknown said...

Josh Drozdowski
GEOG 320 online


This issue illustrates how encompassing the issue of global warming,water scarcity, overpopulation, and overall unsustainable living affect the world we live in and literally everything in it. No man, animal or living organism is safe from the detrimental effects that are exacted by these phenomena.

Are there any ways to sustainably farm fish? I am not at all astute on this topic, but it seems that there should be a where this is possible. Then this in conjunction with conservation efforts to restore wild salmon populations would be beneficial for all. I don't understand absolutely everything has to be chemically modified.

Scott A. Biers said...

At work the other day I was watching the news ticker run along the bottom of the screen and it actually had said something about salmon. It said that if we don't do something about the shortage of salmon that by the end of the year the cost of salmon could go up to $40 per pound!! Now, I am not sure what the current price is for salmon but i am quite sure that it is no where near that price tag. I dont really think that at the rate we consume many of our "delicasies" that there is a way around fish farming, the same with the cafo's we read about. I think where the problem lays is how these places operate.The food the fish are being fed is a large problem. Possible could we facilitate something within the open waters to where we could set up large colonies of these fish and have a sutible way of regulating or containing them, almost like a fish farm in the wild. It could be a possibility if someone where to take the time and compose an idea to handle the task. It may just be a way of handling the problem, but then again here we go playing the part of mother nature trying to rapidly produce the fish. Maybe the only answer is cutbacks in what we eat on the regular.

sjtoffolo said...

The effects of global warming are reaching out to multiple communities. From human to fish habitats, the damage is insurmountable. The loss of habitat for the salmon due to the rising stream temperatures is extremely unfortunate. The cold temperatures of water that they need are inhibited by the warming of the waters. They can not sustain the warm temperatures or spawn. If we are wondering if sustainability is the answer, what other options do we have? We are watching our environment and population suffer. We are losing the quality of life that was once possible. We don't know the exact answers. We can only hope and do our personal best to make things better. We can't write the future until we are there. Let's just hope that we get there, and that we don't have to sacrifice all that we have to do so. From animals, to crops, to land, to humans, the effects reach out far. But, so can the efforts. As we know, we can't have a sustainable tomorrow, if we don't put in the work today.

sjtoffolo said...

The effects of global warming are reaching out to multiple communities. From human to fish habitats, the damage is insurmountable. The loss of habitat for the salmon due to the rising stream temperatures is extremely unfortunate. The cold temperatures of water that they need are inhibited by the warming of the waters. They can not sustain the warm temperatures or spawn. If we are wondering if sustainability is the answer, what other options do we have? We are watching our environment and population suffer. We are losing the quality of life that was once possible. We don't know the exact answers. We can only hope and do our personal best to make things better. We can't write the future until we are there. Let's just hope that we get there, and that we don't have to sacrifice all that we have to do so. From animals, to crops, to land, to humans, the effects reach out far. But, so can the efforts. As we know, we can't have a sustainable tomorrow, if we don't put in the work today.

Chelsey Kasper said...

I don't think people realize the many effects of global warming. Like Josh said, nothing is safe from global warming. With that said, that doesn't mean that nothing can be done. I don't think that it would be a good idea to mess with mother nature because so many unanticipated issues can come into play. This could cause something to go horribly wrong and then we would be worse off than we are now. Instead of changing the environment in which the fish are farmed, we as humans are going to have to change our way of life. We are going to have to cut back on how much seafood we eat and produce. By cutting back, we can help the environment restore itself slowly.

Ryan McMullen said...

I recently read an article in the April 11th New York Times, here is an excerpt: Faced with the collapse of the fall Chinook salmon run in the Sacramento River, the Pacific Fishery Management Council voted Thursday to cancel all commercial salmon fishing this year from the California coast to north-central Oregon. The season was to have begun on May 1.
''This is a complete disaster by any standard,'' said Don Hansen, the council chairman.
I will assume that this will create many problems in lots of areas. The exponentially increasing population is putting large strains on agriculture and farming that helps lead to this happening. Can anything be done to help irrigation in California so not as much water is diverted form the Sacramento river? Education to the masses is the key to helping people know what is helpful and what hurts the environment. I have heard that farmed salmon is better than wild because their diet is controlled. I would mush rather prefer wild salmon and I do not buy farmed salmon. You can still find wild sockeye salmon in the market fairly priced. Global warming affecting so many different earth systems should be the main focus of everyone until we start to figure this new way of life out.

GEOG 320 lecure

Kyle Seay said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Kyle Seay said...

It is very easy to believe that this is happening. The amount of fishing and the way we abuse our natural resources are probably the greatest influences into why we have the problems we do today. Something needs to be done to regain a growth in the population of the salmon. Personally, I am not a big fish eater, on occassion I will when its provided but rarely will I go out of my way to eat it. This is like so many of our other problems that we face today in the nation and its a result of our greediness and inability to address the recongnized problems that we face on a daily basis. All it would take is for everyone to be a little more conservative and care more about what they do and the adverse effects it will have on nature and our resources. However, we as a general population are too naive to control this problem. We are more concerned about making the money and end up abusing all of the great commodities that we possess. For the amount to drop to less than 6% of the normal runs of salmon is completely unacceptable. As individuals we can all do our part to make the resources we have last longer and control the levels of abuse we have on the current amounts of natural resources and commodities that we possess. For the Bush Administration to say they are unsure of why this is happening is ridiculous to me because everyone should know that we create the most major impact on nature and instead of accepting the consequences need to be more proactive in our approach to handling the situations that arise because of the negligence that we enact.

Online Geo 320

Cliffaney said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Cliffaney said...

I grew up in the country fishing and around farms. I never realized how much of this was going around until this course. I don't understand how people can not grasp the concept that what we put into our animals is going into us as well. This article, along with many others from the blogs, have made me question and become aware of the food that I eat. Something needs to be done for the community and for the world in the aspect of how we are receiving our food which keeps us alive, but probably not much longer I guess. At some point in time I believe that there will be cases presented that will change the laws to the better but it is going to take something drastic in order for that to happen, and it will take a lot of time. Something needs to happen now and soon.

Bobby Murray said...

Again another example of the U.s . not being proactive. We saw that a problem could devolop and insted of working to sustain the fish and enviroment we already had, we put our blinders back on and only focused on what is in front of our face. When will we learn the fact that only 6% of the salmon are going to participate in the normal run is astounding. With salmon taking the fast track to extinction what will be our next aquatic dish? Wonder what whale tastes like?